Dry Bulk Shipping update 2015

In 2012 we thought we had identified a 13 year cycle in the shipping industry. Then in mid-2012 we published this report detailing the cycle and anticipating a rally in rates: https://caldaro.wordpress.com/2012/09/27/dry-bulk-shipping-industry/. The rally in rates did occur as the BDI more than tripled by late-2013. As a follow up to that we report we published an update in late-2013, which we got all wrong: https://caldaro.wordpress.com/2013/12/08/dry-bulk-shipping-update/.

Rates peaked a few days after that report and started to decline. The decline retraced much of the 2013 gains, but rates again turned higher in the second half of that year. Right around November 2014, as we were preparing to write an update, rates turned down again. This downturn took the Baltic Dry Index (BDI) to its lowest level since the index was created in the 1980’s, exceeding the 554 reading in July, 1986. Clearly the 13 year cycle had been usurped by market forces: diminishing demand and oversupply of worldwide tonnage.

Undeterred we resumed our search to find some related identifiable index to help determine a turnaround in this industry. After all, every transportation industry goes through periods of cyclicality: the railroads, trucking, airlines, etc. The only one that has not recovered is the shipping industry, specifically the dry bulk sector. The shipping industry is much bigger than just dry bulk. There is the container sector, which has been having some goods years, and the tanker sector, which is currently in a boom. Late last year we uncovered the cyclical relationship for dry bulk. It has nothing to do with time. It has everything to do with price: supply and demand.


When one compares the historical CRB index with the BDI index one uncovers a near direct one to one relationship between commodity prices and shipping rates. Notice every primary and secondary low in the CRB index since 1986 has matched a primary and secondary low in the BDI index. Demand or scarcity of commodities, in general, drive up price and shipping rates. Lack of demand or oversupply of commodities, in general, drive down shipping rates. The comparisons are quite striking: 1986, 1989, 1992, 1999, 2001, 2009, 2012, 2015. The commodity cycle has the biggest direct relationship on the dry bulk sector.


Yesterday we published an update on Commodities. Commodities in general, using the more up to date GTX index, appear to have made a primary wave low and are turning higher. We estimate the upturn could last for a few years and commodities prices, in general, could rise more than 50% from their recent low. This would suggest shipping rates should now be on the rise. And they are!

Longer term we can also make some comparisons as well. During the 1970’s there was a huge commodity boom that peaked around 1980. Then when commodities entered a twenty year bear market the shipping industry entered turbulent times. As the bear market continued shipping companies started to declare bankruptcy as rates plunged, and the industry found itself with an oversupply of worldwide tonnage. This is exactly what has been going on in the industry during the past few years.

Notice how the CRB took six years from the 1980 peak to hit an ABC low, and then went into a trading range for the next 15 years into a Cycle low in 2001. When using the GTX the Cycle low actually ended in 1999. The BDI index made its cyclical low that year: 1986. As shipping companies continued to exit the business rates rose with commodity prices, and the shipping industry hit an equilibrium. Then when commodity prices went into a 15 year trading range, shipping rates went into a trading range but at elevated levels.


This time around commodity prices have been declining for seven years: 2008-2015. The GTX has just made an ABC low and prices have started to rise.


The BDI has also made a low, an all time low, and rates have begun to rise. This analysis suggests shipping rates may have just bottomed in a cyclical low. The BDI should now rise back up to the 2,000 level over the next couple of years.

During the rise, poorly managed or overleveraged shipping companies will continue to fold, as they have been doing for the past few years. Then when the next downturn in commodities occurs, shipping rates should decline to a higher low than 2015. Possibly entering the trading range they experienced during the late-1980’s and 1990’s. Well managed shipping companies should now begin to benefit.

If you would like to follow the BDI and the handful of shipping companies that we track, just review pages 15-16 using the following link: http://stockcharts.com/public/1269446/tenpp/15

About tony caldaro

This entry was posted in selected charts and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Dry Bulk Shipping update 2015

  1. JeffMilano says:

    Thank you Tony, in terms of timeframe you are expecting this to take off soon. But if the mkt hits a P4 will there the prices of shipping stocks be hampered. TX TONY!

  2. I agree. I also wrote a post about this a month ago and bought myself some DRYS and DSX.


  3. Too many ships were ordered in the Good old times.
    And they will be with us for many years to come, even as new ones keep rolling out of the shipyards. The industry’s mistakes live longer than the brief enthusiasms

    The thrill is gone

    … for so many other things too: Stocks, Bonds, the USD.
    Netanyahu, and Mr BB King himself – may he rest in peace

    • tony caldaro says:

      Agree, and many mismanaged and get rich quick shipping companies are folding. Lots of older ships are being scrapped this year. So worldwide tonnage is likely to contract. Still lots of rough seas out there as dry bulkers are barely getting by. But when demand comes in for Capesize the entire sector will take off. Until then …

      • There’s also a strategic factor at play. China needs ships, and China builds ships. China has persuaded many shipowners from Greece and all over the world to build ships in its yards. If they have overbuilt, then that’s bad for the shipowners, but not so bad for China, who will benefit from cheap shipping cost. Did China willingly, and recklessly build too many ships? Maybe… Almost certainly.

  4. torehund says:

    Good update Tony, I dope for the big D in dry bulk, look at macd there on the weekly its just around zero, a whiff and it goes big.

Comments are closed.