REVIEW
On a week to week basis it does not look like the market had done much: SPX 1355 last friday, SPX 1357 this friday. During the week, however, the market had quite a roller coaster ride. A gap up opening on tuesday was sold as the SPX hit 1362. Then the market hit its low for the week thursday morning at SPX 1325. A full reversal followed, and in just over 24 hours the week ended with a marginal gain. For the week the SPX/DOW were +0.10%, but the NDX/NAZ were -1.05%. Foreign markets were also mixed. Asian markets lost 1.9%, Europeans markets gained 0.3%, and the DJ World index was -0.6%. Economic reports for the week continued their winning streak, with positives outpacing negatives 6 to 5. On the uptick: consumer credit, the PPI, WLEI and the monetary base, plus the trade deficit and weekly jobless claims improved. On the downtick: wholesale inventories, export/import prices, consumer sentiment and the budget deficit expanded. Next week we get a look at industrial production, the FED’s beige book and housing.
LONG TERM: bull market
While most of the world’s stock indices are in bear markets. We’re still projecting an ongoing bull market in the US, and possibly England and Switzerland. The bull market that started in March 2009 at SPX 667, hit SPX 1422 in April and we project it will hit the mid-1500′s during 2013. Our wave count remains the same: a five Primary wave bull market underway to complete Cycle wave [1] of the new Supercycle.
Primary waves I and II completed at SPX 1371 and 1075 respectively, in May and October 2011. Primary wave III has been underway since then. Primary wave I divided into five Major waves, with Major wave 1 subdividing into five Intermediate waves. Major wave 1 of Primary III has also subdivided into five Intermediate waves. The only question now in the long term count is if Major wave 2 bottomed at SPX 1267, or is still in progress.
MEDIUM TERM: choppy uptrend continues
Four weeks ago the market generated a WROC buy signal. These signals usually precede uptrend confirmations and are better than 90% reliable. Shortly thereafter the market did confirm an uptrend as the SPX has risen from 1267 to 1375. These buys signals, however, do not differentiate between impulsive and corrective uptrends. Thoughout this bull market we have had 19 WROC buy signals. None of them have failed to occur during uptrends. However, there were two B wave uptrends during 2011, that were fully retraced, which also generated WROC buy signals. Therefore, the recent buy signal does not rule out the possibility that this uptrend is a B wave.
When examining in detail both rallies during this uptrend, SPX 1267-1363 and SPX 1309-1375, neither look that implusive. The first looks like an ABC: SPX 1336-1307-1363, as does the second: SPX 1334-1313-1375. This would suggest this uptrend is, thus far, a double zigzag B wave, and not the beginning of Major wave 3. In fact, after six weeks, this uptrend does not even have the look of a third wave. Third waves are typically strong impulsive moves. Just like Major wave 3 of Primary I, and the two Intermediate wave iii’s of Primary’s I and III. This uptrend is looking more and more like an Intermediate B wave of Major wave 2. The count posted on the DOW/NAZ charts. This would imply an eventual retest of the SPX 1267 low, when this uptrend concludes.
SHORT TERM
Support for the SPX remains at the 1313 and 1303 pivots, with resistance at the 1363 and 1372 pivots. Short term momentum ended the week quite overbought. Thus far the uptrend, as noted above, looks like a series of ABC’s rather than 5′s. The uptrend has unfolded in three waves: 1267-1363 (96 points), and 1309-1375 (66 points). Oddly enough, this uptrend is now also forming an upward rising channel, which is posted on the SPX daily and hourly charts.
The significance of this channel is threefold. Should the SPX break through the upper trendline, this uptrend could still advance in what was expected to be a Major wave 3. Should the SPX remain within the channel, the uptrend could make a higher high. Should the SPX break below the lower trendline, it is quite probable the uptrend ended as a corrective ABC at SPX 1375. Thus far this uptrend looks more like a day traders market, than an investors buy and hold market. With friday’s close just a bit more than 1% below the uptrend high it may be a good time to do some hedging.
Short term support is at SPX 1342/47, 1334/38 and 1324/27. Overhead resistance is at the 1363, 1372 and 1386 pivots. Short term momentum ended the week quite overbought, and a pullback can now occur at any time. The short term OEW charts swung positive again with the rally over the SPX 1346 swing point. Best to your trading!
FOREIGN MARKETS
The Asian markets were mostly lower on the week for a net loss of 1.9%. All but China remain in uptrends.
The European markets were mostly higher on the week for a net gain of 0.3%. All indices remain in uptrends.
The Commodity equity group were mixed for a net loss of 0.8%. All but Brazil are in uptrends.
The uptrending DJ World index lost 0.6% on the week.
COMMODITIES
Bonds have not confirmed a downtrend yet and continue to drift higher gaining 0.1% on the week.
Crude remains in an uptrend gaining 3.2% on the week.
Gold is in a choppy uptrend and added 0.2% on the week.
The USD continues to uptrend, but was relatively flat on the week.
NEXT WEEK
A full calendar ahead for the week. On monday Retail sales and the NY FED at 8:30, then Business inventories at 10:00. Tuesday, we have the CPI, Industrial production and the NAHB housing index. Wednesday, Housing starts, Building permits and the FED’s beige book. Then on thursday, weekly Jobless claims, Existing home sales, the Philly FED and Leading indicators. On tuesday and wednesday FED chairman Bernanke testifies before the Senate and House, respectively, on the semiannual monetary policy report. Best to your weekend and week!




This is the perfect blog for anyone who wants to know about this topic. It contains truly information. Your website is very useful. I admire the valuable advice you make available in your expertly written content. I want to thank you for this informative read; I really appreciate sharing this great.http://www.capitalheight.com/
Dow confirming a possible OCO (shoulder head shoulder)
link alalysys:
http://www.partnerinvestimentos.blogspot.com.br/
thx partner
Pingback: Risk-Reward Market Report | The Risk-Reward Market Report
Pingback: The Risk-Reward Market Report | The Risk-Reward Market Report
Tony, the most probably count for such a crash could be:
http://scharts.co/M3eMh5
http://scharts.co/P9YBCc
(your wild card, on pag 17)
Mario, Doubt we make new lows during the next bear.1982 held above 1974, and even 1949 held above 1946.
Hi Tony, since a few months ago I’ve been suggesting to take a look at cycles and the NDX/OLD DOW pattern.
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
M1 says:
March 31, 2012 at 9:11 pm
A look at cycles:
1. http://blogs.decisionpoint.com/chart_spotlight/2012/03/four-year-cycle-approaching-crest.html
2. OLD DOW
1932 low – 1938 low = 6 years
1938 low – 1942 low = 4 years
NDX
2002 low – 2008 low = 6 years
2008 low – ?
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
It is july and the market looks fine, however. You are expecting the bull market to continue until 2013.
On my side, I do still believe the bull market is over, but I expect a slow, but choppy correction bottoming in 2014.
However, I am still nervous that NDX may be repeating the old dow pattern. That scenario may be suggesting a real crash. The market falling to new lows in less than 5 months surprising everyone.
Few were expecting the 2008 crash. The old dow pattern suggested that crash.
Back in the 40s, the 200ma was the important support for the old Dow. Once it was taken, the market crashed. NDX is still above that level.
In 2008, banks were in problems I wonder what could cause such a market crash this time?
GL
thanks Mario, The NDX is a secondary index.Fun to trade, but more than twice as volatile as the SPX/DOW.
Mario, A more consistent market relationship, since 1929 ended a GSC, would be the 1966-1982 period.1966 – wave 3 high – 20001973 – wave 5 high – 20071974 – secular low – 20091976 – wave 1 high – 2013?1982 – secular ends – 2016?
Sounds reasonable to me !!
Thanks Tony,
I think it is good to recall the performance of both index in 2008.
NDX fell 54% (2239 – 1018), and
DJI fell 54% (14198 – 6469)
amazing, isn’t ?
SPX fell 58% if I remember correctly
Pingback: UPDATES, NEWSLETTERS, AND THE WEEK AHEAD: $SPY $AAPL $WWD $CMCSA $DIA $POT $GPS $MOS $ACI $QCOM $RIMM | TTG Trading
In the W5 pattern, 1325 should hold for final C up into top. JMHO. ST-ES trades down 10 points and rallies 5. Same bots – different day.
Monsoons blew in 70* tempts this weekend. Very nice.
thx HD, same bots different day
H D – you ar elooking for 1325 that we hit last week to hold and move us into what area for a C wave? I am not aware of your overall count I guess? What is your price?
Tony – if you are bearish into 12000 Dow or lower why are we on the bullish count? much Thanks to the pros…
http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=$INDU&p=60&b=1&g=0&id=p86169286975&a=67036682&listNum=11
Turtle Trend Analysis: INDIAN NIFTY last traded price: 5224.05. Current Hourly Trend: Down, Dynamic Trend SL: 5266.9.You may visit http://www.facebook.com/stockmaniacs?ref=ts. Visit http://stockmaniacs.net/blog/what-is-turtle-trading-system-download-free-amibroker-formula/
monday roadmap for anyone interested:
http://standardpoor.wordpress.com
Hi – that 1 2 you have… are you looking at a running correction in the two position? I do not believe they exist or are very common in that position are they?
Tony, after we work off this overbought level can you see us first taking out 1375 before the next down leg? Thanks
Maks, The market could do that, but it is not required in the current wave structure
Technical question;
Certain sectors have been hit hard, eg. materials.
I’m curious;
Which technical indicators do you like to use to decide to buy a specific stock (especially if such stock/s have been in a downtrend for past 12 months or so)?? eg. which technical indicators would you use to consider buying CAT or FCX??
Cheers
FCX has been in a bear market since early 2011.No signs of a completed pattern yet, or positive divergences on the weekly RSI.Look at the pos and neg div. at important turning points.http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=FCX&p=W&b=3&g=0&id=p26992251037&a=201972151&listNum=11
I respect Tony’s work a lot (there are many reasons for that), but I really do not like this series of 1s and 2s from the June’s low. At least in the approach that I follow (the Neely Method), this cannot be considered the beginning of an impulisve move higher.
So, my idea is that the market is tracing out a complex correction from the June’s low: a zig-zag, X-wave, and then a Contracting Triangle (or Flat) from the late June’s low). All this should lead to another sharp move lower twd 1240/20 in August/September.
here’s a link to my chart:
http://www.trendrecognition.com/images/stories/2012/indexes2012/sp500_st_20120715.gif
Regards,
Alexander
Have to agree… I’ll be surprised if we get past 1364 on the SP 500 this week… still alot of overlapping waves, but I do think Tony is leaning to correction further yet at least to a retest of June lows, and I’m in the same camp
Actually, I’m looking for the DOW to hit just under 12,000.Think that will be an ideal entry point.
Yeah Tony! I’m looking for Dow 11735ish on the low side and Dow 11925ish on the high side as my next target for long entries on a continued pullback.
A line and curve study of support and resistance
http://markettime.blogspot.ca/2012/07/s-500-july-14-2012.html
Why a huge gap down?????Looking for a small gap up to 1360-63
http://scharts.co/Li8Gru
I give up what is that chart suppose to show as far as gap down??????
The chart is suppose to show where it looks we may be headed to.
” ..but even if we have a huge gap down on monday” ..suggest a possibility only.
In short, you are expecting a gap up on monady….I am not…that’s all.
Thanks for response
Nothing is confirm yet, but even if we have a huge gap down on monday, I think your suggestion “it may be a good time to do some hedging” comes at a perfect time.
GL
What a great weekend update, Tony !!!
Thanks again. Stay with us for many more years !!
Good read Tony.
The Semiconductor sector is already testing the lows of July. Usually the Semiconductors show strong positive divergence at significant lows (they are a leading sector since they are so far up the supply chain).
Currently I see negative divergence:
http://tacticalstrategist.com/2012/07/14/getting-a-resolution-next-week-tactical-view-2012-07-14/
On the opposite end of the through spectrum, I can see that Thrusday had the earmarks of a Bear Trap or final shakeout.
Due to these facts and that the trading range is getting old (I have this move as the final E-wave in a B-wave triangle), I think a resolution up or down within a week should be possible.
thx TAC
thx TAC
Greece has impacted all markets previously and until the situation is clear (in or out of EU), I still think it will play big. Given there are rumours going again, I would think that Greece news could start some downwards activity soon
Sad, sad, news indeed. I regularly review two chart books that I have bookmarked – one is Tony’s, and the other is Terry’s. Sad this makes me feel …
RIP Terry…Bud
I’ve been following Terry and Tony for almost a full year now; sadly, one is gone. Peace be with you, Mr. Laundry.
Hello Tony,
You start your LONG TERM analysis by saying: “…most of the world’s stock indices are in bear markets” then in the “FOREIGN MARKETS” paragraph you mention:
- “All but China remain in uptrends”,
- “All European markets remain in uptrends” and
- “All commodity equity groups remain in uptrend except Brazil”.
So practically all markets except China and Brazil are in uptrend yet, “most of the world stock indices are in bear markets”?
Some ill-intentioned people could say that the confusing language is used so that regardless of what happens you can claim your forecast was correct.
On the other hand, one could only blame you for just being imprecise as you probably simply forgot to qualify what kind of uptrend you were referring to by omitting the word “corrective” in front of “uptrend”, hence meaning that these markets are just in a “corrective uptrend” , a wave 2 or 4, within a longer term bear market.
Is my latter interpretation correct?
Erka,
I’m not Tony but I know exactly what he is saying because I see it in my work. You can still have uptrends within the context of cyclical bear markets. AKA a counter-trend rally. Virtually the whole world aside from the U.S. is in cyclical bear markets. So will the U.S. follow or are we the laggard? That is the question. My internal indicators are on buy signals for the most part but the price action is extremely choppy and looks corrective as Tony has noted. We are at an important inflection point for the market without a doubt. I have 9 month cycles due in April and July this year and January, April, and October 2013. April 2012 was obviously a high. July 2012? We shall see. One of the hardest markets to interpret that I have ever seen. I think central bank manipulation has a lot to do with it. Regardless, it is very unusual to see bullish looking internals and what can only be interpreted as bearish choppy price action. I also have a ton of cross market analysis suggesting that the S&P 500 should be headed down to 1000-1100 or so. On the other hand it sure seems like bearish sentiment is pretty high. Lots of talk about another 2008 this week. We should know soon but as low as the VIX is now it is likely time to buy some downside protection just in case.
Hi Erka, Uptrends and downtrends are medium term events: weeks to months.Bull and bear markets usually last for years.Every bear market has uptrends, as well, as every bull market.But the general long term trend is as stated.
Pingback: Risk-Reward Weekend Market Report | The Risk-Reward Market Report
Tony, here’s a chart showing the relationship between Long-Term US Interest Rates and Inflation over the last 200 years or so:
Chart is copyright measuringworth.com.
I’ve circled 10 points where the tops and bottoms of the secular interest rate cycle coincide closely with peaks in the inflation cycle.
Points 2, 8, 9 and 10 coincide with known peaks in the Gold price (in 1813, 1920, 1946 and 1980).
Point 4 is quite misaligned, and the inflation data is missing for Points 3 and 7; but other than that the alignment is quite striking I think.
The present day is similar to Points 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9. In each case we saw an inflation spike just as long-term interest rates went into their final bottoming process (apart from point 7 where the data is missing).
After short-term rates bottomed in 1940, it was another 6 years before long-term rates followed suit. Since short-term rates probably bottomed in 2011, that suggests long-term rates will reach their low-point in 2017, and Gold prices should peak at the same time.
That would give an 18 year Gold bull market from 1999-2017, with the 2007-9 Dow bear market at its centre. That’s the same alignment the 1967-80 and 1933-46 Gold bull markets had to the 1973-4 and 1937-42 Dow bear markets.
18 years may seem long for a bull market in Gold; but there was a similarly lengthy bull market in 1797-1813. It had a double bottom in 1797/1799, and peaked in 1813, a year before the 1814 peak in long-term interest rates.
I’ve used the London Market Price data to identify the bull market:
Nice work Alex, The CPI is no lon ger considered a benchmark of US inflation.In the 1980′s the Reagan adminstration started to modify it and this has continued through the decades.In fact, the FED no longer uses the CPI. It uses the PCE.http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/graph/?id=PCENotice the plunge in 2009, and recovery into 2011.I tried to access the data sets on that link with no success.Receive only advertisments.
There does seem to be some kind of problem with that URL when I use my iPad.
When I’m on 3G it takes me to some useless website advertising tape measures; but when I switch to wifi it takes me to the correct website with all the historical data!
Doesn’t seem to be any such issue when I use my PC, as that goes straight to the correct website.
I’m going to email the site admin as I’ve no idea why this is happening?
Might be worth trying it again from your PC if you have the time.
Alex, Got through this time.There is an inconsistency in the quoted prices.For the NY price it shows small peaks in 1815, 1837, 1865 and 1935The London prices shows small peaks in 1813 and 1920. These price discrepancies could be contributed to Gold inflow/outflows due to currency changes, since both were on some sort of gold/silver standard. Since the price eventually went back to the fixed rate I’m not sure they are meaningful.
I just posted several more charts on my Twitter feed that you might find interesting!
Glad you got through! Hope you can make good use of all that data!
I suppose the inconsistencies are probably due to their not being a true global market in Gold in the 19th century; but a number of localised markets (news travelled pretty slowly in 1813 after all!)
Ofcourse the massive intervention in the Gold market prior to 1972 makes it difficult to identify bull markets.
To try and figure out what the Gold price would’ve done had this intervention not existed, I’ve assumed it would have peaked with inflation (as it did in 1980, and most likely in 1946, 1920 and 1813).
The combination of low interest rates with high inflation in 1946 led to negative interest rates in real-terms, which is obviously bullish for Gold.
I think the self-same cocktail is very likely to develop over the next few years, as long-term rates fall to their ultimate low. It seems this has always caused inflation to spike in the past: so I’m assuming the same pattern will repeat this time around.
Something has to give sooner or later
Completely unrelated to this weekends update
Last nite Terry Laundry of T Theory fame passed away. Thier were only two poeple in the investment community that I read and listen to faithfully and now sadly there is only one.
I just felt that I needed to thank you Tony as you are the last man standing whose opinion I value above all others even if we disagree seldomly.
Thank You
Dave
Dave, Heard the sad news last night.Terry has added a new indicator to the phenomenon we call markets.
Dave, Heard the sad news last night.Terry has added a new indicator to the phenomenon we call markets.
Tony,
I read through your analysis and I understand your reasoning for the preferred count. I agree that the recent price action is more characteristic of a corrective rally rather than an impulsive rally. However, if this potential “C” wave is going to continue lower, it needs to get underway quickly. How much more does this rally need before we are forced to switch to the alternate count on the SPX 60-min. chart?
A breakout above the upper rising trendline would help.
Yes, that would do it but I don’t think SPX has to go that far to overturn the preferred count — a move back to 1375 shoud be enough to do that.
Given that the indexes are overbought in the short term, and given the choppy nature of this market, we are not likely to see too much more upside before we head lower again. The true count may remain masked by the choppiness.
the true count may still be masked, agree